Right!  In fact, all of these answers are right!

Global warming -- Methane is 23 times times stronger (for a given weight,
averaged over 100 years) than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas.  Since one
molecule of carbon dioxide is 2-3/4 heavier than a molecule of methane, it takes 11
methane molecules to equal the weight of 4 carbon dioxide molecules .  When you
adjust for this fact, it shows that methane is, molecule for molecule, a little over
8-1/3 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.  
Therefore,
every molecule of methane that is trapped and used for energy, releasing a
molecule of carbon dioxide afterwards, not only makes the methane a renewable
fuel, it also prevents the 8-1/3 greater greenhouse effect that would have
happened if the methane had been released unchanged into the atmosphere
.  
Where does methane come from?  Houweling et al. (1999) give the following values
for methane emissions [http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/134.htm#4211]:

Methane (CH4) emissions (Tg/yr -- note: Tg = "teragrams" or trillion grams)





















You can see that the total methane emissions per year is about 620 Tg.  The
contribution from livestock (overwhelmingly from cattle) is about one fifth of that
total output, and more than a third of all methane released by human activity
.

Manure odor problems --  The complex brew of gases released by manure in a
livestock manure lagoon creates a powerful odor in the surrounding environment.  
An enclosed methane digester uses anerobic bacteria to consume most of those
chemicals and create the methane fuel.  Solids remaining after the digestion
process have very little if any odor.  Further drying renders a pathogen-free fibrous
material that retains the nutrient value of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and
it can be used as fertilizer or even bedding (see
http://www.auri.org/news/ainapr02/11page.htm).  

Improved farm profits -- Farm-based methane generators have been around a
long time on a small scale, but environmental concerns, rising energy costs, and
new technologies have been helping bring them more into the limelight.  Some of















Another link for agricultural methane production information (with more links) is
http://www.mnproject.org/programs/energy_sub/farmbasedenergy.htm.  
Click here
to
visit this site now.
It's likely that methane generation from livestock manure could only ever be a
locally important energy resource for certain areas of Minnesota.  But in a world
economic environment that's changing the rules for both agriculture and for
energy, methane generation is something that deserves a closer look, especially
when we consider all the renewable energy resources as a complete picture.


Natural emissions
 
Wetlands (incl rice production)
225
Ocean
20
Termites
15
Methane hydrates(frozen in
permafrost and ocean beds)
10
Natural total
290
Anthropogenic emissions
(caused by human activity)
 
Energy
110
Landfills
40
Livestock
115
Waste treatment
25
Biomass Burning
40
Anthropogenic total
330
the advantages for farmers can be found at this website:  
http://www.nextstep.state.mn.us/res_detail.cfm?id=484.  
Click here to visit the
website now.
The new interest in methane generation is generating a lot of information about
techniques, and benefits to farmers.  Although the most efficient current designs for
farm-based methane generators require a minimum of 300 head of cattle (around
1% of Minnesota dairy farms meet that threshold), work is being done on designs
more appropriate to the average Minnesota dairy farm.  For more resources and
information for farmers to consider, check out the link to the Minnesota Clean
Energy Resource Teams website:
Click here.
Case studies of Midwest agricultural methane generators can be found at this
website:  
Click here for case studies.